Hacked on launch day? Imploded on the third user? Woke up to a $4,000 API bill?
Get proper infrastructure already. And make money.
01 / problem
Every boilerplate looks great on day one. Then reality hits you.
02 / priority
Not flashy good-to-have features. Load-bearing infrastructure your product's survival depends on.
03 / setup
One command to set the infrastructure up. One command to integrate your product details in it.
04 / stack
Complete production stack. Four accounts, one deployed service.
05 / maintenance
I made the boilerplate good. Enforced rules make sure it stays good. Your agent breaks one, the build goes red.
06 / pricing
No nonsense, no subscriptions, no "updates for a year". You get the repository and the licence.
/integrate skill and every rule file07 / decision
Proof you can re-run yourself, and the questions I would be asking.
HTTP security headers. Nonce CSP, HSTS, frame and referrer policy, permissions policy.
Re-run this scan →Deeper pass: CSP composition, cookie flags, TLS configuration, subresource integrity.
Re-run this scan →Google's audit of the deployed app, on a throttled mobile connection.
Re-run this scan →Having doubts or concerns? Run them by me before you decide.
Most boilerplates go all-in on easy setup and pretty design, because that's what the "I want to launch and get rich TODAY" market demands. The problem is that it's often done at the expense of everything you can't see in a demo, leaving you with a pretty homepage and a shitstorm of problems. My boilerplate too gets you to launch fast (see section 03). The difference is that I unequivocally put security and reliability first.
Node 20+, pnpm, the Supabase CLI, and accounts on Supabase, Vercel and Stripe. The rest of the techstack is optional and up to you, the platform works either way.
You get the repository as it stands on the day you buy, and you keep access to it. There's no maintenance schedule, but if I ship something significant, you'll have it.
Yes, in one specific case. The repo ships pnpm check. It checks your Node and pnpm versions and your keys, then runs the type checker, the full test suite and a production build, and tells you which side the problem is on.
If it says the code is broken on a clean clone and I can't fix that within 48 hours, you get a full refund and I won't argue about it. If it says your Node is out of date or a key is missing, that's your setup rather than my code — I'll gladly help you through it, but it isn't grounds for a refund.
Beyond that, no. It's source code, and once you've cloned it you have it.
One thing worth saying plainly: this assumes you're comfortable running commands in a terminal and managing your own accounts. If that's new to you, this isn't the right purchase, and I'd rather tell you now than take your money.
No, it's the furthest thing from it. This boilerplate was indeed built with the help of AI, but it's a product of many months of meticulous development, crash testing and endless code reviews, all under heavy human supervision. AI coding is not the problem – sloppy coding is. 304 tests, lint rules that fail the build, a nine-gate CI pipeline, and a contract layer are enforced to keep the next ten thousand lines of code as good as the first.